Official Bottling | 43% ABV

Score: 3/10

**Disappointing.**
***TL;DR***
*A privileged disappointment - that I love*

Price is very much a factor

If that’s not your thing, I guess there are other places in the Whiskyverse that will score a whisky based solely on the liquid in a sample or a bottle, without mention or reference to the cost of ownership. But my limited brain capacity is smaller than my whisky budget, especially right now, so I struggle to comprehend these thoughts. Thus, price is part of my whisky experience.

Look, despite what I’m about to say, there is a place for it: just judging whisky purely on the liquid, allowing the reader, consumer, listener, what-have-you, to thereafter decide for themselves what a fair price is, based on their own perspectives and financial mobility. Really, I understand the opinion of those who think in such a way.

But that isn’t here.

Not because we have a policy or anything, in fact our scoring system is actually wide open and without guidance on price at all. It doesn’t happen here because we harness individual opinion. Much like tasting notes or any other aspect, it’s entirely up to each individual reviewer to share what they’ve paid and decide if it should be a factor in their judgement of the whisky. Through their words, they may then rationalise and contextualise to best convey their experience.

I am also mildly aware that, as we sit in January of 2024, many of you will may be approaching price discussion fervour, or fatigue. It’s a hot topic and the general sentiment is that we’ve had enough. To those of you who are indeed tired of price complaints, you should probably settle in for the long haul, because these chants from the galleries are very disgruntled and they grow louder. Whisky folk are protesting with turned backs. Admittedly, they can do so with the added padding of months-worth, and perhaps years-worth, of stashed whisky, but who can be surprised about that?

Buying whisky isn’t exactly the same as buying a yacht, but it is still a luxury and not a cheap one either, so for many it amounts to the same; a true indulgence. Some of it is expensive enough to elevate it to exclusive privilege, especially when it comes to the stuff that folk are lamenting, celebrating, hyping or otherwise amplifying in some way. But, as it’s affordable for some, it encourages others to push their spend further.

There are today, and hopefully always will be, entry-level, great quality bottles. At Dramface we strive to unearth exactly those, but the older age statements and mythical bottles will always be sought after and seen as something of a rite of passage, at least for those aware and able. We all want to try the legends, we all want to taste the old stuff.

However, the gap between entry level and aged whisky today, is woefully huge. In my opinion, it’s also contrived and deliberate.

Anecdotally, it doesn’t really cost that much more, per litre, per year, to mature whisky. The majority of the cost is in the manufacture and capital costs. Thereafter, its nurture alone is much lower. Ignoring the mess of cask investment we find ourselves in at present, the main reason old whisky has been typically more expensive is that there’s a lot less of it. It’s been plucked and pillaged over its years in warehouses and eventually it gets to the point where each parcel or cask will only be parted with when the price is attractive enough to permit. I’ve heard this time and again, but since I can’t share calculations or reliable reference sources, it remains anecdotal.

However, if you’ve ever seen the price lists of the past, they very much back up this theory; older is more expensive, but not by factors of two, three or more with each step up in age statement. Not like we see today. Why is this? Well, it’s a great topic for a lengthy future feature piece perhaps, but today, let’s blame Macallan.

Their 12yo Sherry Oak is around £90 RRP, it can be bought for less right now, but when I needed one for a special project a while ago, I had to pay £90. That really is already absurdly expensive. Paying that was not pleasant. But whatever, their 18yo version of the same is £350. More than triple the price of the 12yo. Can we just think about that for a second?

That’s how much money you are asked to pay for a bottle of 18yo Speyside whisky that, for this commenter, is actually pretty good and yet also pretty unremarkable. That’s around a 25% increase per each additional year of maturation from 12 years to 18 years. The 12yo is 40% ABV, with the 18yo you do get an additional 3% ABV, but it’s still chill-filtered.

For kicks, let’s look at the 25yo version of the same: £2,100 RRP. Six times the price of the 18yo, or around 30% added for each year of additional maturation. Luckily, everyone in the know is utterly bored of Macallan and their antics these days and the word is gradually seeping into the greater whisky consciousness. There’s a thing called the internet and folk seem fond of it.

I don’t hate Macallan for this, I’m ambivalent, which I’ve written about, but their policies and contrived positioning has had an effect on the wider whisky plain.

There remain arguments to support their strategy alongside more to rail against it, but these are the facts. Does it sell? Well, Macallan goes to great lengths to make it appear so. Although, in January 2024, the 2023 releases are still for sale on the official Macallan site. Regardless, it sets a tone.

How can any other 18 or 25 year old whisky compete? On price alone, to the inexperienced, it’s deemed a budget version and on brand they don’t (yet) have the pedigree to take on the original luxury whisky. So, what do other producers do? It would seem they arbitrarily move their prices closer.

This isn’t unique to whisky, of course not. It’s Business 101 and it’s everywhere. But whisky is business-to-consumer and calling it out should also be everywhere. So permit me to call some more of it out.

Diageo has given us drop after drop of hilariously high, scarily arbitrary price increases in recent years. Dramface pages are littered with examples of nonsensical and random behaviour. Originally it was their yearly hike in their Special Releases, then also pathetic attempts to fleece folk through aspirational but clumsy, short-cut Mortlach revamps. Soon selected core ranges such as Oban, Lagavulin and Talisker saw huge overnight positioning price hikes, as well as some completely random oddballs such as this 17yo Teaninich and this shockingly contrived attempt to celebrate Jim Beveridge and World Whisky Day. But today, I have one that’s new. At least to the Dramface pages: Caol Ila. Beautiful, elegant, reliable - and plentiful - Caol Ila.

And we absolutely will be considering the price in the scoring for this one, even though its clumsy price ramp presents difficulty. Have a look at this wee Google-y mess:

*Google retail prices: from £224 through to £450*

Not entirely sure what the RRP is here, but we see a confusing range of £224 to £450, with Diageo’s own malts.com site listing it at £450, so let’s go with that. But clearly, the genie is well and truly out of the bottle. It’s all over the place. We’re not talking a fiver here or a tenner there, we’re in the realms of hundreds of your hard-earned Sterlings.

Royal Mile Whiskies are currently offering it on sale with £89.99 off, but it’s still £359.96. If I bought at the cheapest online place, I’d save a further £136 on that and £226 on RRP. So, truly a mess. I really do feel sorry for retailers, but I suppose some may bunce with incumbent stocks at times too so, Yin and Yang.

Worse, the bottle you see open in the photos below was purchased for less than €100 in 2019. The back-up bottle was bought, by me as a birthday gift to myself, in May of 2021 at an RRP at the time of less than £150. In the intervening two and a half years, Diageo has tripled that. My purchase was from TWE, who have doubled their retail and currently sit in the middle of the mess above at £295; I’ll guess that’s based on some older stock on hand.

Let’s forgive, for a moment, that this malt is chill-filtered, perhaps coloured and presented at 43% ABV, and consider its proposition at £150. Honestly, it’s rather compelling. Clearly so, I bought a bottle. Delightful Islay single malt at twenty-five years of age. I’m scoring it an 8/10, it really is Something Special, based on the Dramface Scoring Guide. Now, let’s consider it at £224. No surprise; it drops. A lot. It would ask the whisky to act up to such a point I think it may only score a six; Good stuff.

At £450 there is only one word in the scoring system for it - Disappointing. It can’t live up to a £450 outlay, it absolutely cannot. If we, at Dramface, after nigh-on two years and over 750 reviews, chose to ignore the price here and score this on the liquid alone, we would lose our voice, our integrity and our place among our daily readers. And rightly so. We’d have ignored our responsibilities as real-world, enthusiast reviewers, which will always lie with the real world enthusiasts who read and support us.

That renders this Caol Ila 25, which I do actually love - a 3/10. Someone dropping £450 on this, in light of everything else in that price band that might rock their whisky world, would be left wanting. This would, surely, disappoint any Dramface reader with a £450 hole in their pocket.

So let me ask, how should we score this? Based on the price originally paid in 2019? Based on what I paid in 2021? Based on the cheapest online UK price today? Based on secondary? Or based on the RRP today? Your answers, I guarantee, will vary.

We need to remember, it’s the producer who has given us this quandary; these are consequences of decisions they’ve made. So the only thing to do is for me, as the reviewer today, to choose what to do and explain why I’ve done so. This is 8/10 whisky that can easily be demoted if the price has placed it in competition with things much, much better.

Let me now try to articulate the whisky experience, which is, on the whole, a lot more positive.

Review

Caol Ila 25yo, Official bottling, 43% ABV
Review bottle gifted in 2019 (€100 paid). £150 paid in 2021 for 2nd bottle pictured.
RRP in 2024: £450, available for £224 here and there, lower still at auction.

The bottle on review was a gift to me in 2019, from a dear and generous friend visiting from Germany, who confessed he paid less than €100 for it. I was shocked by the gesture. I may have shed a wee dram-lubricated tear.

Given how long I’ve taken to crack and enjoy it, I’ll try to share the bottling code. As a tiny etched code, it’s almost impossible to read - let alone decipher - but, by diligent effort, it is L8052CM001.

caol ila 25 bottle image — Score: 3/10

**Disappointing.**
***TL;DR***
*A privileged disappointment - that I love*

Nose

Clean, sweet and slightly floral honey. Ripe melon; galia and cantaloupe. Butter shortbread, something green and vinous; tomato vines, nettles, white wine. Old oak, moss and damp canvas, white chocolate and a hint of mint. Coastal salty air. Smoke exists in distant and very muted puffs.

Palate

Very gentle, soft and quiet arrival. Given time it brings fruitiness, adding sweet citrus to those aromatic melon notes, although it doesn’t quite reach the tropical notes we’d hope for in such pours. Light spices, ginger and white pepper. Honeyed oak, fruit syrup, a touch of brine, mint and seaweed. A decent finish too, given the low ABV, but would suffer sipped in contrast with bolder drams. One to sip and savour on its own.

A dignified, elegant and classy, yet subtle, Islay experience.

The Dregs

So there we have it. An 8/10 whisky - should you have one kicking around from the reasonable days. If you buy from the cheapest online source today, it’s a six or a seven on a good day. Sorry, above £200 there are too many decent, natural and more compelling mature Islay malts to consider, even if there are few of this venerable age.

My mouse pointer has hovered over the 17yo Port Askaig more than once over the holidays, I’ve so far held fast. I know it’s not quite a quarter century but it’s also £122, natural and 50.5% ABV, and likely Caol Ila. Still a bit expensive, on the face of it. I digress. This 25 year old Caol Ila, at £450 it will absolutely be a let down, a disappointment, a misstep.

Diageo do good things too, they aren’t quite the evil megacorp we like to picture them as, but their arbitrary, distant, unhinged wisdom in the handling of their malt in recent years, from a commercial perspective, makes them easy to drop like so much of last year’s whisky news.

In their communication, there’s always the sense that they speak directly to shareholders and rarely to impassioned consumers. They can do better, for the longer term health of Scotch whisky, with a little less focus on the short term benefit of their ever-greedier shareholders. Perhaps with a lot more focus on the buy-in of the vocal and invested malt drinkers who brought them the confidence to pivot from a “blending company” to guardians of fine single malt in the first place. They are also party responsible for making good quality whisky available to the next generation, who are likely to be even more financially restricted.

So how can we take this 3/10 Disappointing Dramface scoreline and render it higher, in 2024?

Well, say what you like about the secondary market over the Covid years but, before all the crazy, it was once a decent temperature-check on true values, so I’ll leave you with that thought and you can search around yourself. But it hovers around £200 or just under and, if you look further, you can find it lower still. Some speculators may be losing on that but I doubt it, they are probably bottles from those able to grab-and-stash when it was a true value buy.

I’m not encouraging you to head to auction, nor am I encouraging you to buy this at retail. I’m simply sharing my own thoughts on a bottle I own, like every other Dramface writer.

*Recent Caol Ila 25yo OB auction closing prices; £200 and under. Source:* *Scotch Whisky Auctions*

We all take from it what we want. The truth remains in the detail; the context, the words and the individual reasoning. We take guidance and look at our purchasing decisions based on what our peers, friends and those we trust are enjoying. We hope we can reciprocate too; guide others in some way through our own experiences. While we do, we need to consider, more than ever, the value of whisky. Not just the cost. The score may have shocked you today, but I hope I’ve made a case to explain my own stance on it.

We can look back and reflect on these recent crazy, challenging, overheated years and try to objectively ask: Which of our decisions were good?

Diageo would do well to consider the same.

Score: 3/10 (8/10)

Tried this? Share your thoughts in the comments below. WMc

Dramface is free.
Its fierce independence and community-focused content is funded by that same community. We don’t do ads, sponsorships or paid-for content. If you like what we do you can support us by becoming a Dramface member for the price of a magazine.
However, if you’ve found a particular article valuable, you also have the option to make a direct donation to the writer, here: buy me a dram - you’d make their day. Thank you.
For more on Dramface and our funding read our about page here.